![]() Post a question at Amazon's for some insights from users. I think I recall that Hert (the (main?) programmer of PS) was an IMatch user once. I never worked with Photo Supreme, so I cannot comment. Some are free, some are affordable, some will cost you several hundred US$ per user per month, with 5 or 6 digit setup figures. These DAMs are designed for different audiences: entry-level users, consumers, professional photographers, marketeers, corporate users, institutional users, scientific users. If you have never heard about IMatch, this link will open your eyes for the DAM market and the products available. There are many DAM systems to choose from. ![]() I wish I'd found this product a long time ago! I do wish it had a little cleaner view like photo supreme, but otherwise I can't find a single reason I'd want to use photo supreme. A lot of photo programs are confusing on this point and don't make it clear whether you're looking at a real time folder view, or a database folder view. For instance the attached screenshot instantly communicates to an astute first time user what the "folders" view really represents. There are also some UI touches I really like. ![]() Personally I actually find the interface much easier to follow, even though there is a lot more. When I read a lot of debates on internet forums about this, I read a lot of people who felt imatch was confusing compared to photo supreme. ![]() I expect biased answers here :-) but my initial impression is that imatch is the product that power users will love, and photo supreme is for those who are overwhelmed by imatch and don't need all the features. ![]() In my search for a lightroom replacement it has come down to these two products. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |